Search for: "Chambers v. Z"
Results 1 - 20
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2012, 1:05 pm
In today’s Chamber judgment in the case Diriöz v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:57 am
The fact that the prosecutor stood on a raised platform in the courtroom did not infringe the principle of equality of arms.In today’s Chamber judgment in the case Diriöz v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:57 am
The fact that the prosecutor stood on a raised platform in the courtroom did not infringe the principle of equality of arms.In today’s Chamber judgment in the case Diriöz v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:21 pm
Comments In the Grand Chamber judgment in Guja v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
The Center under Julius Chambers filed a brief in the Grutter v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
In Magyar Keresztény Mennonita Egyház and Others v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 3:22 am
In this post, Mathew Purchase QC of Matrix Chambers shares his views on the Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of Z) v Hackney LBC [2020] UKSC 40. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 1:36 pm
Z o.o v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:57 am
In today’s Chamber judgment in the case Diriöz v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:32 am
Earlier in July 2023, a blog post by Jacob van de Kerkhof discussed the shortcomings of the recent Grand Chamber judgment in Sanchez v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 4:33 pm
On 4 December 2015, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) handed down judgment in the case of Roman Zakharov v Russia ([2015] ECHR 1065). [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 4:29 pm
The Court in Gürbüz and Bayar v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
Watler, Shannon Z. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm
The Grand Chamber in Hutten-Czapska v Poland had found a breach of Article 1 of Protocol 1 where rent restrictions imposed by the State had prevented the owners from adequately maintaining and keeping their properties in repair. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm
The Grand Chamber in Hutten-Czapska v Poland had found a breach of Article 1 of Protocol 1 where rent restrictions imposed by the State had prevented the owners from adequately maintaining and keeping their properties in repair. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 8:05 am
” Here, the Court has already found that Bar-Z had a legal right to interfere with App Star’s contracts with the chambers of commerce. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
A summary of the facts The case of Macatė v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am
Oscar Davies, a barrister at Lamb Chambers, and Jack Castle, a barrister at Henderson Chambers, offer their views on the Elan-Cane decision (R (On the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) [2021] UKSC 56) in this piece that first appeared in the New Law Journal. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 3:17 am
[www.angel-diaz.us][www.angel-diaz.us] L Z INTmCIRCUIT COURT OFTHEF][FTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY,FLORIDASTATE OF FLORIDA,PlaintiffVS. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:06 pm
The judgment in Sinkova v. [read post]
